Cost savings and cost-effectiveness of clinical preventive care.
نویسندگان
چکیده
It is well established that preventive care reduces the prevalence of disease and helps people live longer, healthier lives. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of preventive care can guide policy-makers to allocate scarce resources. This synthesis reviews the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of clinical preventive care. Key findings include: although many preventive services are a good value (defined as costing less than $50,000 to $100,000 per Quality Adjusted Life Year), only a few, such as childhood immunizations and counseling adults on the use of low-dose aspirin are widely regarded as cost-saving. Costs to reduce risk factors, screening costs, and the cost of treatment when disease is found can offset any savings from preventive care. Prevention can reduce the incidence of disease, but savings may be partially offset by health care costs associated with increased longevity. Whether these additional competing risk costs outweigh the savings from avoiding the targeted disease depends on how healthy people are during the added life years. Given that so few preventive services save money and that these services are already in wide use, it is unlikely that prevention can reduce health care spending. The authors question whether the emphasis on savings is appropriate and suggest it is better to focus on high value preventive care, taking into account increased longevity and quality of life.
منابع مشابه
Repeated tobacco-use screening and intervention in clinical practice: health impact and cost effectiveness.
BACKGROUND This report updates 2001 estimates of disease burden prevented and cost effectiveness of tobacco-use screening and brief intervention relative to that of other clinical preventive services. It also addresses repeated counseling because the literature has focused on single episodes of treatment, while in reality that is neither desirable nor likely. METHODS Literature searches led t...
متن کاملA closer look at the economic argument for disease prevention.
DISEASE PREVENTION HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE PREferred option for promoting health and reducing disease rates. For many, this health argument is reason enough to invest in prevention, economics aside. Others, citing scarce resources, advocate a careful assessment of the costs and savings associated with prevention. It initially costs more to deliver preventive services; the savings the resulting heal...
متن کاملThe art and science of incorporating cost effectiveness into evidence-based recommendations for clinical preventive services.
As medical technology continues to expand and the cost of using all effective clinical services exceeds available resources, decisions about health care delivery may increasingly rely on assessing the cost-effectiveness of medical services. Cost-effectiveness is particularly relevant for decisions about how to implement preventive services, because these decisions typically represent major inve...
متن کاملPoint-of-entry screening for C. trachomatis In female army recruits. Who derives the cost savings?
BACKGROUND Screening women for genital Chlamydia trachomatis at entry to military service provides an opportunity to reduce costs associated with sequelae of this infection. However, financial responsibility for screening may be debated. More than 50% of recruits return to civilian life within 2 years. The military and the civilian health care systems would both benefit from a screening program...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report
دوره 18 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009